Start with five pages, not fifty
Pick one homepage keyword and four supporting long-tail pages. For each keyword, record search volume, difficulty, trend, intent, and the shape of the top ten results.
A small set of useful pages is easier to improve than a large set of thin pages.
Build the update loop
Collect official releases and community questions daily. Turn stable questions into guides, comparisons, FAQs, and support pages.
After publishing, watch impressions, clicks, indexing, and the queries that nearly rank. Those queries become the next content batch.
Create a hub-and-spoke structure
Give each page one primary job: an overview explains the model, a setup guide explains access, a comparison answers a decision question, and an open weights guide records repository facts. Link those pages together with descriptive anchors.
The goal is a useful path for readers, not a page-count target. Every link should help someone take the next research or implementation step.
Publish evidence with the claim
Place the relevant official source near claims about availability, pricing, licensing, or model behavior. Record what the source does not establish, especially for hardware, benchmark interpretation, and commercial use.
When a source changes, update the affected page and its related links together. This keeps the site coherent and makes later audits faster.
Measure before expanding
Use impressions, clicks, query wording, and indexing status to decide which page deserves another revision. A page with no clicks may need clearer intent or stronger internal links; it does not automatically need more keywords.
Keep a short change log and review the site as a connected topic cluster. This playbook is a method note, not a promise of rankings.